This website is intended for healthcare professionals

Measurement of microelectric potentials in a bioelectrically-active wound care device in the presence of bacteria

    Published Online:https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2015.24.1.23

    Abstract

    Objective:

    Wound healing is enhanced in the presence of an external electrical field. The purpose of this study was first to investigate whether microelectric potentials (EPs) can be generated when the innovative design of a silver (Ag)- and zinc (Zn)-printed wound care device was exposed to saline solution which is commonly used to clean wound sites; and second to measure the generated EPs while the device was exposed to bacterial culture suspensions to mimic infection.

    Method:

    An Ag/Zn-printed test specimen as a wound care device was designed to accommodate Ag and Zn half-cell potentials by alternatively printing them on a woven polyester material in a well-characterised dot matrix pattern. A well-calibrated high impedance EPs measuring system was used to measure any EPs generated. Ultrasensitive inductively coupled plasma analysis was performed to determine whether the device induced any increase in trace metals in rabbit blood following implantation for 2–4 weeks.

    Results:

    EPs were consistently generated under various conductive solutions at the levels of 120.4±26.3mV (average±standard deviation) on Ag dots and -506.5±76.3mV over Zn dots to form microcircuits with EPs of 626.7±86.3mV between the Ag and Zn metallic elements of the dressing. Interestingly, the patterns of EPs generated with stable polarities were consistent when the device was exposed to bacterial suspensions for mimicking wound infection. Implantation of the device did not cause any increase in Ag or Zn in rabbit blood.

    Conclusion:

    The Ag/Zn-printed wound device generated sustained EPs successfully in the presence of various conductive fluids without changing EPs including polarities. Consistently generated EPs at each battery couple with Ag/Zn-based wound device would restore disrupted physiologic bioelectric signals on wound sites, which could lead to improved wound healing.

    Declaration of interest:

    The opinions or assertions contained herein are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as official or as reflecting the views of the US Department of the Army, the US Department of Defense, the Department of Veterans Affairs, or the Henry M. Jackson Foundation for Advancement of Military Medicine. The research was supported by the US Air Force medical support agency (AFMSA), office of the Air Force Surgeon General, USA.

    References

    • 1 McCaig, C.D., Song, B., Rajnicek, A.M. Electrical dimensions in cell science. J Cell Sci 2009;122: 4267–4276. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 2 Messerli, M.A., Graham, D.M. Extracellular electrical fields direct wound healing and regeneration. Biol bull 2011; 221: 1, 79–92. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 3 Vieira, A.C., Reid, B., Cao, L., et al. Ionic components of electric current at rat corneal wounds. PloS one 2011; 6: 2, e17411. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 4 Nuccitelli, R. Endogenous ionic currents and DC electric fields in multicellular animal tissues. Bioelectromagnetics 1992; Suppl 1: 147–157. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 5 Zhao, M., Song, B., Pu, J., et al. Electrical signals control wound healing through phosphatidylinositol-3-OH kinase-gamma and PTEN. Nature 2006; 442: 7101, 457–460. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 6 Song, B., Zhao, M., Forrester, J.V., McCaig, C.D. Electrical cues regulate the orientation and frequency of cell division and the rate of wound healing in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002; 99: 21, 13577–13582. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 7 Nuccitelli, R. A role for endogenous electric fields in wound healing. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2003; 58: 1–26. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 8 Guo, A., Song, B., Reid, B. et al. Effects of physiological electric fields on migration of human dermal fibroblasts. J Invest Dermatol 2010; 130: 9, 2320–2327. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 9 Tai, G., Reid, B., Cao, L., Zhao, M. Electrotaxis and wound healing: experimental methods to study electric fields as a directional signal for cell migration. Methods Mol Biol 2009; 571: 77–97. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 10 Zhao, M., Penninger, J., Isseroff, R.R. Electrical Activation of Wound-Healing Pathways. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2010; 1: 567–573. MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 11 Cortese, B., Palama, I.E., D'Amone, S., Gigli, G. Influence of electrotaxis on cell behaviour. Integr Biol 2014; 6: 9, 817–830. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 12 Reid, B., Song, B., McCaig, C.D., Zhao M. Wound healing in rat cornea: the role of electric currents. FASEB J 2005; 19: 3: 379–386. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 13 Nuccitelli, R., Nuccitelli, P., Ramlatchan, S. et al. Imaging the electric field associated with mouse and human skin wounds. Wound Repair Regen 2008;16: 3, 432–441. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 14 Fish, R.M., Geddes, L.A. Conduction of electrical current to and through the human body: a review. Eplasty 2009; 9: e44. 12 17 Google Scholar
    • 15 Banerjee, J., Ghatak, P.D., Roy, S. et al. Improvement of Human Keratinocyte Migration by a Redox Active Bioelectric Dressing. PLoS One 2014; 9: 3, e89239. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 16 Reid, B., Zhao, M. Measurement of bioelectric current with a vibrating probe. J Vis Exp 2011; 47: pii: 2358. MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 17 Kloth, L.C. Electrical Stimulation Technologies for Wound Healing. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle) 2014; 3: 2, 81–90. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 18 Franek, A., Kostur, R., Polak, A. et al. Using high-voltage electrical stimulation in the treatment of recalcitrant pressure ulcers: results of a randomized, controlled clinical study. Ostomy Wound Manage 2012; 58: 3, 30–44. MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 19 Franek, A., Kostur, R., Taradaj, J. et al. Effect of High Voltage Monophasic Stimulation on Pressure Ulcer Healing: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial Wounds 2011;23: 1, 15–23. Google Scholar
    • 20 Poltawski, L., Watson, T. Bioelectricity and microcurrent therapy for tissue healing - a narrative review. Phys Ther Rev 2009;14: 2, 104–114. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 21 Thakral, G., Lafontaine, J., Najafi, B. et al. Electrical stimulation to accelerate wound healing. Diabet Foot Ankle. 2013; 4. doi: https://doi.org/10.3402/dfa.v4i0.22081. MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 22 Castana, O., Dimitrouli, A., Argyrakos, T. et al. Wireless electrical stimulation: an innovative powerful tool for the treatment of a complicated chronic ulcer. Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2013; 12: 1: 18–21. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 23 Bach, S., Bilgrav, K., Gottrup, F., Jorgensen, T.E. The effect of electrical current on healing skin incision. An experimental study. Eur J Surg 1991; 157: 3, 171–174. MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 24 de Campos Ciccone, C., Zuzzi, D.C., Neves, L.M., Mendonca, J.S. et al. Effects of microcurrent stimulation on hyaline cartilage repair in immature male rats (Rattus norvegicus). BMC Complement Altern Med 2013; 13: 17. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 25 Lee, B.Y., Al-Waili, N., Stubbs, D. et al. Ultra-low microcurrent in the management of diabetes mellitus, hypertension and chronic wounds: report of twelve cases and discussion of mechanism of action. Int J Med Sci 2009; 7: 1, 29–35. MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 26 Reid, B., Graue-Hernandez, E.O., Mannis, M.J., Zhao M. Modulating endogenous electric currents in human corneal wounds--a novel approach of bioelectric stimulation without electrodes. Cornea 2011; 30: 3, 338–343. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 27 ISO-10993-6. Biological evaluation of medical devices Part 6: Tests for local effects after implantation 2007. www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=61089 (accessed Decemeber 2014) Google Scholar
    • 28 ISO-10993-1. Biological evaluation of medical devices Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a risk management process. www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=44908 (accessed December 2014) Google Scholar
    • 29 ISO-10993-11. Biological evaluation of medical devices Part 11: Tests for systemic toxicity.2006. /www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=35977 (accessed Decemeber 2014) Google Scholar
    • 30 Kim, H., Makin, I., Skiba, J. et al. Antibacterial efficacy testing of a bioelectric wound dressing against clinical wound pathogens. Open Microbiol J 2014; 8: 15–21. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 31 Navy, U.S. Navy Electricity and Electronics Training Series. Module 1—Introduction to Matter, Energy, and Direct Current. 1998 (accessed December 2014) Google Scholar
    • 32 Lee, R.H. Electrical Safety in Industrial Plants. IEEE Transactions on Industry and General Applications 1971;IGA-7:10–6. Google Scholar
    • 33 Song, B., Gu, Y., Pu, J. et al. Application of direct current electric fields to cells and tissues in vitro and modulation of wound electric field in vivo. Nat Protoc 2007; 2: 6, 1479–1489. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 34 Kloth, L.C. Electrical stimulation for wound healing: a review of evidence from in vitro studies, animal experiments, and clinical trials. Int J Low Extrem Wounds 2005; 4: 1, 23–44. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 35 Harding, A.C., Gil, J., Valdes, J. et al. Efficacy of a bio-electric dressing in healing deep, partial-thickness wounds using a porcine model. Ostomy Wound Manage 2012; 58: 9, 50–55. MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 36 Blount, A.L., Foster, S., Rapp, D.A., Wilcox, R. The use of bioelectric dressings in skin graft harvest sites: a prospective case series. J Burn Care Res 2012; 33: 3, 354–357. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 37 Kucerova, R., Walczysko, P., Reid, B. et al. The role of electrical signals in murine corneal wound re-epithelialization. J Cell Physiol 2011; 226: 6, 1544–1553. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 38 McCaig, C.D., Rajnicek, A.M., Song, B., Zhao, M. Controlling cell behavior electrically: current views and future potential. Physiol Rev 2005; 85: 3, 943–978. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 39 Zhao, M., Agius-Fernandez, A., Forrester, J.V., McCaig, C.D. Directed migration of corneal epithelial sheets in physiological electric fields. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1996; 37: 13, 2548–2558. MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 40 Zhao, M., Pu, J., Forrester, J.V., McCaig, C.D. Membrane lipids, EGF receptors, and intracellular signals colocalize and are polarized in epithelial cells moving directionally in a physiological electric field. FASEB J 2002; 16: 8, 857–859. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 41 Lin, F., Baldessari, F., Gyenge, C.C. et al. Lymphocyte electrotaxis in vitro and in vivo. J Immunol 2008; 181: 4, 2465–2471 Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 42 Li, L., Gu, W., Du, J. et al. Electric fields guide migration of epidermal stem cells and promote skin wound healing. Wound Repair Regen 2012; 20: 6, 840–851. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 43 Ramadhinara, A., Poulas, K. Use of wireless microcurrent stimulation for the treatment of diabetes-related wounds: 2 case reports. Adv Skin Wound Care 2013; 26: 1, 1–4. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 44 Bolton, L., Foleno, B., Means, B., Petrucelli, S. Direct-current bactericidal effect on intact skin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1980; 18: 1, 137–141. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 45 Spadaro, J.A., Berger, T.J., Barranco, S.D. et al. Antibacterial effects of silver electrodes with weak direct current. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1974; 6: 5, 637–642. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 46 Matl, F.D., Obermeier, A., Zlotnyk, J. et al. Augmentation of antibiotic activity by low-frequency electric and electromagnetic fields examining Staphylococcus aureus in broth media. Bioelectromagnetics 2011; 32: 5, 367–377. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 47 Leaper, D. Appropriate use of silver dressings in wounds: International consensus document. Int Wound J 2012; 9: 5, 461–446. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar